RACING’S SAVIOUR: HANDICAPS? OR GULLY BOP?

I’ve stopped listening to radio’s tiresome and uninformed horseracing coverage.

One Gleaner affiliated radio station treats listeners to a weekly whine about the claiming system giving the impression that, if only handicapping returned, racing would magically become profitable again.

The bellyaching Power Pair insist claiming succeeds nowhere whilst handicapping succeeds everywhere (ROFL). They cite Trinidad where they claim (ouch) Chris Armond was forced to bring back handicapping. Maybe. Trinidad’s January 31 nine-race card included five optional claimers; two maiden races; and two “handicaps”. And Trinidad offers rich purses.

Even Trinidad’s ballyhooed prosperity appears illusory. On Arima’s finances, Andre Baptiste (Guardian; March 4) wrote: “It’s understood placed prize money hasn’t been paid for a few race days and some owners are being asked to not attempt to cash their winner’s cheques from as far back as Boxing Day 2014.” Baptiste also raised concerns regarding possible increased corruption, the bane of handicapping systems everywhere.

Racing systems (handicapping/claiming), without more, don’t significantly affect profitability. The Power pair nostalgically romanticize “the good old days” (1960s/70s) forgetting horseracing was then the only game in town. Now, worldwide competition is a click away. CTL competes or dies.

These financial fundamentals are critical to profitability:

  1. Divestment
  2. Reduction of pernicious 30% tote takeouts
  3. Restructuring purse distribution
  4. Breeders’ incentives
  5. Use of technology driven betting options

Europe, especially England, is the Power Pair’s exemplar but England’s tote takeouts are less than 15%; owners’ purses not subject to deductions and Breeders’ incentives abound. Still, England’s industry, handicapped (owww!) by Bookmakers’ dominance, struggles financially. Hong Kong, Australia and Japan succeed because of low Tote takeouts plus Tote Monopolies.

For those with eyes to see, the following extracts from an article (How high takeout ruined Italian racing) written for the Thoroughbred Racing Commentary (February 2, 2015), by Attorney-at-law Carlo Zuccoli, an international consultant on fixed-odds/pari-mutuel betting are interesting:

Until [Tuesday, June 27, 1995], Italy had been one of [Europe’s] leading countries for breeding, racing, and betting turnover. After that “Black Tuesday,” it was never the same….

In those days, Italians were legally allowed to bet only on horse racing. Every racecourse ran its own pari-mutuel operation [with] many fixed-odds bookmakers on-course. Off-course, there were 329 betting shops..

Bookmakers on-course paid 15% of turnover to the [Promoter]... The betting shops paid 17%.

Each betting shop produced its own…prices, and bettors also had the option of betting at riferimento…[Tote odds]…….

Then, …the…Italian Senate passed a bill to outlaw riferimento and introduce a [Tote Monopoly]. It was the way that Tote was run with a huge takeout of more than 30% from the win pool alone that caused the problem.

Betting shops, instead of giving 17% of their turnover to [Promoter], received 42.5% of the sky-high takeout…just for selling tickets for the Tote risk-free.

Betting turnover began to plummet. And so did prize money.

In most racing jurisdictions with a [Tote Monopoly] (e.g. France, Japan, Hong Kong, and Singapore) three crucial criteria are met:

  • ..racecourses are owned by the same organizations that run betting, control TV rights and provide [purses].
  • Takeout is fair…
  • Costs [are] low.       [e.g.] in France, [Promoter’s] points of sale (cafès and tobacconists) get 1.67% of [their] turnover…

None of that happens in Italy.

There…[Promoters lease racecourses from private landowners who] don’t provide any prize money. [Landowners] receive €62 million from the [Promoter] (which is….a department in the Agriculture Ministry).

[Promoters] also pay [€53 million over six-years] to have racing on TV;..[The TV station] is also licensee for 4,000 [betting] points of sale….through which it receives…around 12% from every bet dwarfing, for instance, French distribution cost of 1.67%.

Tote pools are generally small….

So “Black Tuesday” changed the face of Italian racing beyond recognition. And it got a whole lot worse in 2000.

That was when the Ministry of Finance….published a tender to increase the number of betting shops to 1,000 (from 329)….

[The result; same market shared among many more betting shops]

For 2014, betting turnover fell by 18%…. Take-out was €185 million….of which [Promoter] received €66 million from which it had to find €97 million [purses] and €60 million for the racecourses [plus administration costs].

[Italy] has been unable to pay €28 million in [purses] for the last quarter of 2012. [Promoters promise] the money will be paid in 2015 but in 2013 [they promised] the money [would] be paid in 2014….”

Sound familiar? Handicapping, schmandicapping! We MUST address financial fundamentals first. Until then, only Gully Bop can increase sales.

Peace and Love

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: