NO WATER; USELESS REGULATION; MERCILESS MONOPOLY

It appears No Water Commission (NWC) and Office of Useless Regulation (OUR) co-produce a great comedy routine.

Last Tuesday’s wail about their many discourtesies to The Old Ball and Chain attracted immediate reaction; a letter from an equally frustrated NWC customer, a Mona Heights resident, who wrote:

After reading your column, I realized the experiences I’ve had recently with NWC were similar to that of your family.

I’m now wondering if there are other [Jamaican] consumers experiencing difficulties with NWC and just can’t be bothered….”

She enclosed copy correspondence among herself, NWC and OUR of which any staff writer for Saturday Night Live would be proud to claim ownership.

I found myself repeatedly shaking my head while reading through her travails which seemed identical to Old BC’s.  She experienced a sudden visit (August 15) from two NWC technicians who told her the meter was recording excessive amounts (turns out triple to quadruple the norm). They inspected and cleared the meter on the spot. So she wrote to the Customer Service Manager a letter she scanned and e-mailed that same day:

I appreciate very much the concern NWC is showing; however, there appears to be a problem with this meter which needs corrective action (replacing the meter if necessary) for the following reasons.

  • I was off the Island between June 29 to July 15;…the apartment was unoccupied and the water supply was turned off in my absence…
  • There are no leaks in the apartment, and no taps have been left running or toilet leaking
  • The water consumption history for the last seven months (January to July 2016) has shown a consumption of 30 an average of 4.29 thousand gallons per month

I invite NWC to conduct some further checks on this meter before the exorbitant bill is sent to me.

She received an e-mail reply on August 18:

We acknowledge receipt of your e-mail. The account was review (sic) and it’s confirmed the current bill has shown an increase to that of previous bills [WOW! Talk about insight!].  A recent inspection was done on August 15 and the meter….was found to be in good working condition and indicated no leak on the premises…..

Based from (sic) the findings the bill is payable…………

We appreciate your business and thank you for allowing us the opportunity of serving you [DWL]

Best Regards
Your Customer Service Representative

Well, “Your Customer Service Representative” with no name and no care for customers, all I can say is piss on you from a lofty height. Your spineless regurgitation has taken the matter NO FURTHER.  The very least nameless, uncaring “Your Customer Service Representative” could do is to honour your customer’s request to have the meter tested.

So, my correspondent replied by e-mail (August 19):

I’m very disappointed with your response. I feel as if I’m summarily dismissed by NWC without any further investigation…

Did you read my letter? Is this how you treat a good customer who has a history of paying bills in a timely manner….…Is there a possibility the meter could have MALFUNCTIONED TEMPORARILY….? Can you investigate further?

There’s no way I could’ve consumed the amount of water the meter reading shows………. I’m the only resident…..I conserve water diligently and there are no leaks…  I’m also requesting proof this meter is certified by Bureau of Standards…

In frustration she copied her e-mail to OUR and Consumers Affairs League asking for “consideration” and “further investigation”. OUR replied. Guess who? Yep, Old BC’s pal Liana Haffenden, Head of Department of Doing Nothing. Liana wrote:

OUR acknowledges receipt of your e-mail.

We’ve noted your concerns [well, goody, goody gumdrops] and wish to advise you OUR was mandated to provide an avenue of appeals for consumers.  As such if you’re dissatisfied with the FINAL RESPONSE from NWC you can appeal to us for further investigation …..

We thank you for bringing this matter to our attention and look forward to assisting you in the event our services are required in the future.

Best regards

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaauuuuuuugggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

WTH does she mean “if you’re dissatisfied”? Did she read the e-mail beginning “I’m very disappointed….I feel as if I’m summarily dismissed”? How does a customer know which response from NWC is “FINAL”?  Should she ask Regis to find out?  Imagine policemen telling a battered wife they can’t take action because she just spoke to her husband.

Good God Almighty, is there no balm in Gilead offered to victims of this merciless monopoly by bumbling, bungling, boring bureaucrats?

Peace and Love

Advertisements

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: