LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR AND HIS VYBZ

The following story is true.

The names have been changed to protect the guilty. Thirty years ago, I represented Lloyd, now deceased, a big property owner in a rural parish and a high-level activist for one of our political tribes. One night, while trying to relax at home, his neighbour, hosting a “session”, turned the music up too loud. The police version of what happened next was Lloyd walked over and shot his neighbour.  Lloyd’s version is an altercation ensued because he asked his neighbour to turn down the music; his neighbor reached for a gun; and Lloyd outdrew him.  According to Lloyd, the neighbour’s gun was picked up by his policeman friend and “disappeared” after being entered in the station diary which itself also disappeared.

Lloyd maintained  he was convicted due to a series of mishaps and sentenced to a term of years at Her Majesty’s pleasure. The neighbor was severely injured and sued in the Supreme Court for damages.

That’s where I came in. Lloyd’s wife, a decent, upstanding professional in deep distress, asked me to represent Lloyd in the civil suit.  I told her I would but “where your husband is vacationing is not a place I voluntarily visit. So, I’ll enter an Appearance for him and ask the other side for time. When your husband’s holiday is over, he’s to come and speak to me.”

The matter remained in limbo until Lloyd was able to come to my office. After the niceties, the first thing he said was “Mr Robinson, how come we’re only just meeting on this?”  I replied “Didn’t your wife tell you? Where you were is not a place I visit”

He laughed “Den, Mr Robinson, she never tell YOU?”

“Tell me what?” this with wide-eyed innocence.

“Mr. Robinson, I never spend more than two days a week in that place. You coulda visit me at mi yard anytime!”

I recalled Lloyd’s case during the raging controversy over Vybz Kartel’s recording of new music and winning awards while, as a convicted murderer, he was supposed to be serving a life sentence. Let’s not confuse issues.

  1. Much of Kartel’s music (not all) is vulgar, violent and anti-social. Worse, it encourages violence.  This is nothing more than a sad reflection on Jamaican society as seen by Kartel. All artistes, from time immemorial, have been social commentators. That artistes like Kartel are rapidly becoming role models for Jamaican youth is a tragedy but not one of the artistes’ making.  It’s we who must tackle the societal problems identified by Kartel and reflected in his music.
  2. If the content of Kartel’s music breaches the Broadcasting Commission’s guidelines, as it often does, for public discourse, then those recordings should be banned from the air-waves. This should be music to Kartel’s ears as history teaches “banned” recordings usually sell the most and rule the dance hall.  In the 1960s/70s, much less harsh comment such as Carry Go Bring Come by Justin Hinds and the Dominoes and Fatty Fatty by the Heptones were banned from air play and became anthems.
  3. The significant issue is whether the recordings indicate Kartel has been allowed out of prison illegally or has been breaching prison rules regarding communication devices. I know studio engineers are magicians these days but the sound quality of Kartel’s recordings seem too clean to have originated telephonically.
  4. There’s nothing wrong with any artist producing while in prison if it can be done within the rules. 1970s dub poet Oku Onuora (born Orlando Wong) wrote while serving a 15 years sentence for armed robbery. In 1974 he was permitted by prison authorities to read his poetry with Cedric “Im” Brooks’ Light of Saba band performing in the prison.  Afterwards, his work had to be smuggled out of prison (labeled “subversive”).  By 1976 all was forgiven and he won three prizes in the Jamaica Literary Festival.   In 1977, he was allowed to perform in public at Tom Redcam library.

If Kartel has corrupted the prison system to make this music, he should be convicted and sentenced along with prison officers found helping him. Any music produced by this method should be withdrawn from all aspects of the market.  The fundamental characteristic of a prison sentence is it’s decided by a Judge not the convict.  Also, it’s meant to restrict the convict’s freedom.

Why would Vybz be free to bend prison rules as he likes while police hunt down robot taxis and strip off their tints?

Peace and Love

Advertisements

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: