I’m constantly dumbfounded at the hypocrisy of our public health institutions.

The things they get into a flap over versus the things they ignore are amazing. Ganja is a religious sacrament for many; a social relaxation aid for many others; and a rite of passage for most Jamaican youth since Whoppy kill Phillup. Yet some public health practitioners insist on presenting it as the Devil incarnate. Recently raising alarms about alleged increased ganja usage among our youth since the decriminalization of personal use of small amounts, Senior Medical Officer Winston DeLa Haye was quoted by the Gleaner as saying:

“…I’m coming across some very serious cases of the negative effects of smoking cannabis, and at a higher rate than before. Although I’m treating adults with this problem, a significant percentage are youth, and a lot are under 18….”

Dr DeLa Haye, a National Council of Drug Abuse (NCDA) deputy chairman, referred to a NCDA report and concluded:

I’m seeing patients every day, even on a Sunday, from morning till evening. So I’m seeing the dangers first hand. When you test them for what’s causing this psychotic episode, we get a positive result for cannabis. Smoking pure cannabis can make you psychotic, that’s just the fact.”

No, Doc, it’s NOT FACT. The repeated and unscientific use of the word “I” and the lack of specificity of “negative effects” exposes this wild generalization as nothing more than one personal opinion apparently based on a single practitioner’s personal experience (or anecdotal evidence).

This scare-mongering speculation was debunked by brilliant consultant psychiatrist, Professor Wendell Abel, also a NCDA deputy chairman who maintained the “interpretation” of the NCDA report to show a significant increase in ganja use since decriminalization was plain wrong.  Professor Abel pointed out that ganja use has been stable for the most part.

Dr. De La Haye asserted:

  1. NCDA analysis shows 47% of clients admitted for treatment and rehab between 2006-2011were for issues associated with ganja use.
  2. Ganja was the main drug of impact for which clients sought treatment.
  3. Over 95% of adolescents referred from schools and/or family to NCDA offices for counseling were for problems associated with ganja use

This “data” refers to voluntary referrals by the addict or his school/family. This tells me that Ganja isn’t half as bad as “hard” drugs whose users rarely seek voluntary treatment.

Let’s stop the hysteria. Ganja is a recreational drug. People react differently to it depending on their pre-existing proclivities and weaknesses. Alcohol is a recreational drug. People react differently to it depending on their pre-existing proclivities and weaknesses. Tobacco is a dangerous, addictive drug that has killed more people than ganja and alcohol put together. Any drug given to children will produce more severe negative results than when given to adults.

NCDA conducted a National Secondary School Survey in 2014.  Guess what it found?

  • 60% of students use alcohol;
  • 40% of alcohol users had at least one drink in the past month
  • 30% of alcohol users got it from friends or shops/vendors
  • 50% drank at social/sporting events
  • 20% of student alcohol users at risk for future abuse/addiction

So, time to stop this ignorant, emotional attack on ganja whilst blind eyes and empty glasses are turned to alcohol. Public health practitioners need to check their priorities.

All this takes me back to late 1980s/early 1990s’ when my client, Miss Celma Pinnock’s baby father died in the notorious cement silo collapse. Eventually, she received compensation for her loss which she used to capitalize a retail business (a.k.a “higgling”). Her very first stock purchasing trip ended in more misfortune when she was stopped at Norman Manley Airport and subjected to a most intimate, aggravating and humiliating search by a young, male doctor who forcibly inserted his fingers into her vagina. Miss Pinnock testified that, when she complained, he was curt and dismissive essaying the opinion she was accustomed to it.

She sued the Attorney-General.  In 1993, a jury awarded her $2.5 million damages. The young doctor testified that he’d done nothing out of the ordinary despite evidence that Miss Pinnock suffered severe psychiatric disabilities including “severe anxiety, severe depression, severe phobic responses relating to travel and sexual activity and loss of libido”.  In another case, Sharon Greenwood Henry v Attorney General (2005), Ms Greenwood-Henry suffered a similar fate at the hands of a female police officer and a Doctor at KPH.

Sexual abuse? Ah no nutten. Substance abuse, especially ganja? Dawg nyam yu suppa!

Peace and Love


Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: