To say my recommendation that disarming the citizenry should be a vital tool in any successful crime fighting initiative has gone over like a lead balloon would be an understatement.

Readers, especially male readers, bombarded me with stories of how their guns “saved” them from criminal attack.  I’ve listened as politely as I’m capable but find these tales (tall or short) tiresome.  They expose an old fashioned, chauvinistic, violent mindset that’s both explanatory of the reason crime is where it is and contrary to their earnestly professed Christian beliefs.  They all seem to be saying “I know Jesus said turn the other cheek (a metaphor for ‘find peaceful means to make it impossible for THAT person to slap you again’) but I’ll only do so if my other cheek can fire a gun.”

Many of these defenders of private handgun ownership have never fired a gun in anger or defence; some would injure themselves if they did; and several have private security which allows them to put their guns to its proper use namely an aid in attracting the opposite sex like “sexting”; exposure of underwear; or old faithful “psssssst, come ya gal!”

We must find a way to carry our thinking beyond this macho, damaged, ineffectual attitude that only exacerbates and entrenches the cycle of violence tearing our beloved nation apart. Currently, we’re still mired in colonially inspired methods of protection of body and property from the native rabble.  So we believe that, if a small fire breaks out in a wastebasket at home, the way to deal with it is to light a bigger fire in the living room and watch while they duke it out.

Private gun ownership hasn’t benefitted, isn’t benefitting, can’t and won’t benefit Jamaica. Folks, it just ain’t working. It hasn’t worked for decades. In 1973 murders increased to an all time high of 227. By 1976 it was 367; in 1977, 409 and, in 1980, 490. Last year we recorded 1617 murders (up 25%) and, despite two ZOSOs and a State of Emergency, we’re experiencing another 20% increase in 2018.

I suppose it’s possible some individuals have been “saved” by owning a gun. Obviously, the nation has not. For every story featuring a privately owned gun as saviour, I can tell ten of privately owned guns that failed to save anyone mainly because, when a hit man is approaching, he does his level best not to advertise.  Furthermore, after he has dispatched you to the great beyond, your “legal” gun becomes his illegal gun.  The saddest part of this illusory ownership of guns in private hands is that, in Jamaica, many gunmen don’t need to go to the hassle of killing you to convert a “legal” gun into an illegal gun as the FLA has been exposed as having distributed guns to criminals and, despite cosmetic changes, is likely to continue that sad trend.

Will we ever appreciate the urgency to do it differently? Congratulations to new PSOJ head honcho Howard Mitchell who called for a national summit on crime. This is too important for one political party to hang onto as its fiefdom. Crime is a national problem.  We must devise national solutions, sustainable across political administrations to include disarmament of all save police or military personnel and commitment to a corruption-free, modernized and highly trained JCF.

Those ostriches who believe the threat is as it appears and can’t get worse had better wake up and smell the future. Unless we devise and implement cerebral policies capable of exterminating crime’s roots, we’ll continue to breed and nurture Hydras who regenerate two heads for every one severed.

In good old U.S.A., where milk and honey flows down every street and opportunities for economic success can be picked like wildflower, the word “Columbine” has become shorthand for what’s now a regular horror namely mass school shootings.  On April 20, 1999, two senior Columbine High School students whose names I’ve committed to the infamy of obscurity perpetrated a complex, highly planned attack involved a fire bomb to divert firefighters; propane tanks converted to bombs; 99 explosive devices; and car bombs all of which they purchased “legally” under USA’s laissez-faire weapons laws permitted by the Constitution’s second amendment passed when muskets and colt .45s were modern weaponry. They murdered 12 students and one teacher while injuring 21 others.  Three more were injured attempting to escape. After exchanging fire with police officers, the pair committed suicide.

America went into shock and awe. Tears were shed by the bucketful.  Thoughts and prayers were sent like scattershot to victims’ families. Nothing of consequence was done legislatively. No significant restrictions were placed on private gun ownership. Gun control remained dirty words according to the National Rifle Association’s dictionary.

Columbine happened 19 years ago. It’s no longer in America’s top ten worst mass shootings. El Numero Uno (apologies Don) is October 2017’s shooting in Las Vegas when a 64 year old male fired over 1,100 rounds in 10 minutes from the 32nd floor of the nearby Mandalay Bay Hotel killing 58 and injuring 851 concertgoers at a music Festival. He was later found dead in his room from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

In between, on April 16, 2007, a Virginia Tech senior shot and killed 32 people and wounded 17 others in two separate attacks (another six were injured escaping from classroom windows), approximately two hours apart, before committing suicide. Thoughts and prayers were distributed generously. NOTHING was done to address the obscene gun laws permitting private ownership of dangerous hand guns.

On December 14, 2012, at Sandy Hook Elementary, a 20-year-old fatally shot 20 children (between six and seven years old) and six adult staff members. Before driving to the school, he shot and killed his mother. Again, tears flowed like rivers. More thoughts and prayers clogged the airwaves. No new gun laws clogged the Legislature.

So, on February 14, 2018, a 19 year old student arrived at Florida’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in an Uber and entered the school carrying a rifle in a soft black case. He began shooting two minutes later, moving from room to room and floor to floor, at one point returning to a classroom to open fire again. He then abandoned his rifle and bag and ran from the building, across tennis courts and playing fields, blending in with terrified students running for their lives.

The gunman visited a Walmart; purchased a drink at a Subway; and went to a McDonald’s. He was arrested eighty minutes after the shooting. Tears blurred all TV screens. Thoughts and prayers dominated the news.  President Twit prescribed tougher mental health laws and armed teachers. THIS time, America’s youth, in an inspiring demonstration of courage and intellect, rose to the occasion forming a spontaneous mass movement for strict gun control laws.  I suspect the long overdue change is now inevitable.

Meanwhile, across the pond, on March 13, 1996, a 43 year old male drove five kilometres from his home in Stirling, Scotland to Dunblane Primary School carrying four legally-owned handguns (two 9mm Browning HP pistols; two Smith & Wesson M19 .357 Magnum revolvers) and 743 cartridges. He killed 16 children and one teacher before killing himself.  In addition to thoughts and prayers, the UK offered a public gun control debate culminating in the swiftly delivered Cullen Reports (1996).

In 1997, John Major’s Conservative government amended the Firearms Act to ban all cartridge ammunition handguns except for .22 calibre single-shot weapons. Following the 1997 Elections, Tony Blair’s Labour government introduced a further amendment, banning .22 cartridge handguns as well. No games of political football were played with gun control. Since Dunblane, there’ve been ZERO mass school shootings in the UK.

Down under, in April 1996, a man killed 35 people with a semi-automatic weapon in Port Arthur, Tasmania, a popular tourist area. It was Australia’s deadliest fatal mass shooting. Just weeks afterwards, Prime Minister John Howard was pellucid:

I would dread the thought this country would go down the American path so far as the possession of firearms…” he said AT A GUN RALLY. Australia immediately banned private ownership of dangerous hand guns. In the 18 years before the Port Arthur massacre, Australia experienced 18 mass shootings. Since the ban, NONE!  Studies show total firearm deaths in Australia, declining before 1996, dropped more rapidly after the ban.

I heard the Senate Leader of Government Business, in debating legislation for the removal of jury trials in human trafficking cases, say a jury trial wasn’t a constitutional right. True. Neither is the right to bear (or, based on recent Parliamentary disapproval, bare) arms.

What are we waiting for Jamaica? Think it can’t happen here?

Peace and Love


Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: